Rechercher dans ce blog

Wednesday, September 30, 2020

'Try to be serious.' Climate policy gets rare notice in chaotic presidential debate - Science Magazine

opinionfrom.blogspot.com

Former Vice President Joe Biden (D, left), President Donald Trump (R, right), and moderator Chris Wallace (center) at the first 2020 presidential debate in Cleveland

Olivier Douliery/Pool vi AP

Originally published by E&E News

Between cross-talk and insults, climate change got more attention last night than in any other U.S. presidential debate in history.

Voters might not have noticed.

The bare-knuckle bar fight of a presidential debate was nearing the end when it turned to fuel economy standards and the Clean Power Plan.

The candidates presented starkly different climate agendas. But their policies were buried under a night's worth of inflammatory statements—from President Donald Trump denouncing the election's legitimacy and telling white supremacists to "standby," to Democratic nominee Joe Biden snapping, "Will you shut up, man."

Neither side emerged from the debate with climate on their lips.

"Let's try to be serious," debate moderator Chris Wallace said at one point as he tried to reassert control, later pausing the event to tell Trump: "I think the country would be better served if we allow both people to speak with fewer interruptions."

Yet their answers were still revealing. Trump said nothing about boosting fossil fuel production, the lodestar of his administration's energy agenda.

Instead, he said supportive things about electric vehicles and planting trees, mischaracterizing his record on the former and getting his numbers wrong on the latter.

Trump still denied the impacts of global warming, but he dropped his mockery of climate science, and he aimed his attacks about the Green New Deal at a conventional target: its cost.

Trump also wove climate into his recurring critique of Biden as a career politician who talks about problems but doesn't fix them.

"So why didn't he do it for 47 years? You were vice president. Why didn't you get the world—China sends up real dirt into the air. Russia does, India does, they all do," Trump said, shortly after disparaging the Paris climate agreement between China, India, Russia, and more than 190 other countries.

Biden outlined specific aspects of his plan—including his ambitions to retrofit 4 million buildings in his first term and achieve carbon-free electricity by 2035—while trying to smother accusations of radicalism under his moderate reputation.

But he did waver under Trump's familiar and sometimes misleading attacks, including the president's claim that Biden's $2 trillion plan would actually cost $100 trillion.

That number comes from a conservative group that inflated its estimate by including the costs of universal health care and a jobs guarantee (Climatewire, 1 April, 2019).

"That is not my plan. The Green New Deal is not my plan," Biden said, choosing to distance himself from the progressive framework rather than defend it.

He stumbled on it later, though.

"The Green New Deal will pay for itself as we move forward. We're not going to build plants that, in fact, are great polluting plants," Biden said.

The moderator interrupted to ask if he did support the Green New Deal, and Biden backtracked.

"No, I don't support the Green New Deal," he responded. Trump, who has sought to split Biden's moderate and progressive supporters, interjected: "Oh, you don't? Oh, well that's a big statement. That means you just lost the radical left—it's gone!"

"I support the Biden plan that I put forward. The Biden plan, which is different than what he calls the 'radical Green New Deal,'" Biden said.

The moment recalled Biden's final primary debate in March when, in a heated exchange, he said his plan would ban fracking, only for his campaign to walk back that statement afterward.

Back then, Trump's campaign hammered Biden as hostile to fracking in hopes of peeling away voters in Pennsylvania.

But the president didn't go there last night. In fact, Trump dropped almost any mention of energy jobs to instead talk about energy consumers.

Although the Clean Power Plan never entered into force, Trump claimed the Obama-era regulations on power plant emissions had spiked electricity costs. Trump's vehicle emissions rollbacks would make drivers buy more gasoline, but he said less-efficient cars would sell more cheaply.

Trump returned to that same theme for the Green New Deal. He also floated more outlandish criticisms of it.

"They want to rip down buildings and rebuild the building," Trump said, as Biden tried to speak over him. "It's the dumbest, most ridiculous—where airplanes are out of business, where two-car systems are out, where they want to take out the cows, too. Oh, that's not true either, right?"

Biden, a longtime deficit hawk, parried questions about the cost of his plan by saying it's cheaper than recovering from climate-fueled disasters like wildfires and hurricanes.

"We spend billions of dollars now—billions of dollars—on floods, hurricanes, rising seas. We're in real trouble. Look what's happening just in the Midwest with these storms that come through and wipe out entire sections in counties of Iowa. That didn't happen before, [and it's] because of global warming," he said.

He pointed to his experience overseeing the 2009 stimulus, the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act.

"[We were] able to bring down the cost of renewable energy to cheaper than—or as cheap as—coal and gas and oil. Nobody's going to build another coal-fired plant in America. Nobody's going to build another oil-fired plant in America. They're going to move to renewable energy," Biden said.

Republicans have portrayed Biden as a Trojan horse for socialism. As he did for the Green New Deal, Biden dodged right when Trump tried hitting him with proposals to his left, like Medicare for All.

"My party is me. Right now, I am the Democratic Party," Biden said. "The platform of the Democratic Party is what I, in fact, approved of."

That statement promises to reverberate among climate hawks, who were outraged this summer when the Democratic National Committee removed opposition to fossil fuel subsidies from the party platform at the last minute. At the time, Biden's campaign said he still opposed subsidies.

Biden said the Paris Agreement has been "falling apart" since Trump announced he would quit the deal. He pointed to Brazil's rainforest destruction as an example of what happens without U.S. diplomatic pressure backing climate action.

Trump repeated his claim that poor forest management, not climate change, is to blame for deadly wildfires in the western U.S.

Experts say both are at play. But many scientists say Trump's plans to increase logging could exacerbate the problem by removing the biggest, most valuable trees that are the most resistant to fires while leaving behind the smaller, economically worthless vegetation that becomes kindling.

"Every year I get the call, 'California's burning, California's burning.' If that was cleaned, if that were—if you had forest management, good forest management, you wouldn't be getting those calls," Trump said, saying the U.S. could learn from Europe's "forest cities."

The moderator repeatedly pressed Trump to explain his views on the connection between climate change and human pollution.

Atmospheric carbon dioxide is at the highest level in modern history, though the rate of emissions has fallen due to the pandemic's temporary lockdowns. Trump seemed to conflate the two.

"We have now the lowest carbon. If you look at our numbers right now, we're doing phenomenally," Trump said, adding later about people's connection to rising temperatures: "I think a lot of things do [contribute], but I think to an extent, yes. To an extent, yes. But I also think we have to do better management of our forests."

Biden referenced a report that Trump had asked his advisers in 2019 about stopping a hurricane with a nuclear weapon (E&E Daily, 9 June).

Biden also took aim at Trump's deregulation of methane, a greenhouse gas that in the short term is more than 80 times as potent as carbon dioxide. Trump's Interior Department and EPA have each moved to roll back methane regulations.

"You can now emit more methane without it being a problem," Biden said.

Trump shook his head: "Not true."

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. Copyright 2020. E&E provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"to" - Google News
October 01, 2020 at 12:20AM
https://ift.tt/2GjdOEG

'Try to be serious.' Climate policy gets rare notice in chaotic presidential debate - Science Magazine
"to" - Google News
https://ift.tt/368wPko
https://ift.tt/2YvVgrG

Trump Senior Adviser Brad Parscale Steps Away From Campaign After Police Incident - NPR

Brad Parscale on Wednesday stepped away from his role in President Trump's reelection campaign. Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Brad Parscale, the former campaign manager and longtime digital strategist to President Trump, has stepped away from his role in the president's re-election effort, campaign communications director Tim Murtaugh confirms to NPR. Last weekend, Parscale was involved in an incident with police that saw him involuntarily hospitalized.

In a statement to Politico on Wednesday, Parscale said he was stepping down to seek help for "overwhelming stress" on both him and his family.

Over the weekend, Parscale was involuntarily hospitalized after his wife, Candice, called police concerned that Parscale was attempting to harm himself.

According to the police report from that incident, Candice had bruises on both arms from "a few days ago, during a physical altercation with Bradley, which she did not report."

In the statement to Politico, Candice refuted the police report that Parscale had physically abused her.

"The statements I made on Sunday have been misconstrued, let it be clear my husband was not violent towards me that day or any day prior," Candice told the publication.

Parscale is stepping away from an already diminished role within the campaign, after having been demoted from campaign manager in July. His departure leaves the already struggling campaign without one of its most long-term advisers.

As Trump's approval rating continues to slump — and amid controversies including his response to the coronavirus pandemic, the bombshell New York Times report on the president's taxes, and Trump's ongoing refusal to outright condemn white supremacists — the campaign is struggling to court voters still undecided in the Nov. 3 race.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"from" - Google News
October 01, 2020 at 08:00AM
https://ift.tt/3cP8qp8

Trump Senior Adviser Brad Parscale Steps Away From Campaign After Police Incident - NPR
"from" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2SO3d93
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

G.O.P. Alarmed by Trump’s Failure to Disavow the Proud Boys - The New York Times

opinionfrom.blogspot.com

President Trump’s refusal to condemn an extremist right-wing group in his first debate with Joseph R. Biden Jr. sent a shudder through the Republican Party at a critical moment in the 2020 campaign on Wednesday, as prominent lawmakers expressed unease about Mr. Trump’s conduct amid mounting fears that it could damage the party on Election Day.

It was the second time in two weeks that a collection of party leaders broke with Mr. Trump over behavior they regarded as beyond the pale. Last week, Republicans distanced themselves from Mr. Trump’s unwillingness to promise a peaceful transfer of power if he loses the election.

This time, the subject was racist extremism and the president’s response to a demand from Mr. Biden during Tuesday night’s debate that he denounce the Proud Boys, an organization linked with white supremacy and acts of violence. Mr. Trump answered by telling the group to “stand back and stand by,” a message taken by members of the organization as a virtual endorsement.

On Wednesday, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, called it “unacceptable not to condemn white supremacists,” without criticizing Mr. Trump by name, while Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said the president should “make it clear Proud Boys is a racist organization antithetical to American ideals.”

The exchange on white supremacy provided one of the most inflammatory moments of a debate that unfolded as a chaotic spectacle, as Mr. Trump hijacked the proceedings with interruptions and mockery that left elected officials, foreign observers, business leaders, rank-and-file voters, the moderator and one of the two candidates onstage agog at the unseemly antics of a sitting president. The behavior prompted the commission that oversees presidential debates to say it would make changes to the format for this year’s remaining matchups, including, potentially, the ability to shut off a candidate’s microphone.

Mr. Trump’s unruliness — which provoked Mr. Biden into calling the president a “clown” and telling him to “shut up” — threatened to tear new schisms in his political coalition and reinforce the reservations about the president’s character and leadership already held by much of the electorate.

Representative Tom Cole of Oklahoma, a veteran Republican lawmaker and a Native American, said in an interview that Mr. Trump should denounce the Proud Boys and other extremist groups in clear language.

Credit...Diana Zeyneb Alhindawi for The New York Times

“All he has to say is, ‘There’s no place for racial intolerance in this country,’ and be very forceful about it,” Mr. Cole said.

Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina, one of two Black Republicans in Congress, suggested that perhaps Mr. Trump “misspoke” and urged him to fix his error. But Mr. Scott also allowed, “If he doesn’t correct it, I guess he didn’t misspeak.”

Mr. Trump, in a brief encounter with reporters Wednesday afternoon, tried to contain the damage while stopping well short of a full reversal of his stance. Reprising a ploy familiar from past controversies, Mr. Trump insisted he did not know anything about the group, though he made no suggestion to that effect during the debate.

“I don’t know who the Proud Boys are,” Mr. Trump said. “I mean, you’ll have to give me a definition because I really don’t know who they are. I can only say they have to stand down, let law enforcement do their work.”

Mr. Trump also claimed he had “always denounced any form” of white supremacist ideology, even though he has repeatedly resisted denouncing specific extremist figures and has regularly echoed the rhetoric of racist and far-right organizations.

The way he handled the question about the Proud Boys echoed one of his most brazen evasions over right-wing racism from the 2016 campaign: When the former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke supported his candidacy, Mr. Trump at first declined to explicitly disavow the support and said he did not know who Mr. Duke was.

In addition to his comments about the Proud Boys during the debate, Mr. Trump again attacked the legitimacy of the election, floating conspiracy theories about mail-in voting and encouraging his supporters to police polling places on Election Day. There was no sign that he had been swayed by Republican criticism of his past refusals to commit to a peaceful transfer of power.

Mr. Trump’s debate provocations were all the more dangerous politically because they came at a moment when he is trailing in polls of key swing states and millions of Americans are about to vote. Thirty states have either started early voting or begun sending out mail-in ballots.

Within the Republican Party, Mr. Trump’s unwillingness to give a broad and forceful denunciation of right-wing extremism and white supremacy evoked the most damaging episodes of his presidency, like his equivocal response to a 2017 violent white-supremacist march in Charlottesville, Va.

Still, there was no sign of a full Republican retreat from Mr. Trump, who throughout his term has been treated by most of his party as all but above reproach. Even those who dissented with Mr. Trump on Wednesday did not directly rebuke him, a longstanding approach that spares them blowback from conservative voters and the president himself.

Some officials accused the news media of clinging to an irrelevant issue.

Credit...Anna Moneymaker for The New York Times

“How many times does he have to say it if the question is, ‘Would you denounce it’ and the answer is yes?” said Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, the House minority leader. “He did that.”

But it was not only Mr. Trump’s response on the Proud Boys that had so many Republicans in a downcast mood on Wednesday.

Even Mr. Trump’s political allies acknowledged on Wednesday that he had behaved in a brutish manner during the debate, transforming his first face-off with Mr. Biden — one of his few remaining chances to change the trajectory of the race — into an orgy of mudslinging and personal vitriol against the former vice president.

A handful of Republicans, including some of the president’s most reliable supporters, expressed unease with his dismissal of Mr. Biden’s late son, Beau, and the ridicule of his surviving son, Hunter. “Beau Biden is a hero and it should be acknowledged as such,” said Senator Kevin Cramer of North Dakota.

In a sign of just how disruptive and disrespectful Mr. Trump had been on Tuesday, the Commission on Presidential Debates, which is tasked with organizing the two remaining Trump-Biden encounters, said it would be making changes to the structure of future debates “to ensure a more orderly discussion.”

Mr. Trump’s campaign responded by accusing the commission of “moving the goal posts” to aid Mr. Biden, declaring in a statement that Mr. Trump had been “the dominant force” in the debate.

The president’s flailing onslaught amounted to an unpleasant but useful gift for Mr. Biden, who entered the debate as the clear polling leader in the presidential race and emerged not quite unscathed, but without any obvious damage to his status as the front-runner.

Mr. Biden, who was traveling through Ohio and Pennsylvania on Wednesday, mostly pivoted away from the messy forum, returning to an increasingly familiar message that cast the election as “a choice between Scranton and Park Avenue values.”

Mr. Trump himself was not displeased with his own performance, according to his advisers. On the contrary, he was elated about the debate and saw it as a successful outing for him, according to three people close to the campaign. Some of Mr. Trump’s advisers, who shy away from giving him bad news, made no attempt to disabuse the president of that assessment.

At a late-night rally on Wednesday in Duluth, Minn., Mr. Trump delivered an hourlong recap of his angry debate performance, delivering his stream-of-consciousness attacks to the cheering crowd without a moderator or a rival to get in the way.

He accused Mr. Biden of being a puppet of socialists and communists, lashed out at the news media, complained about the debate’s moderator, called on Mr. Biden to denounce the left-wing movement antifa, and again embraced unproven allegations about the former vice president’s son, Hunter Biden.

Before the debate, advisers had tried to prepare Mr. Trump for a question about white supremacy, pointing out to him that Mr. Biden had made fighting racist violence of the kind that broke out in Charlottesville a central theme of his candidacy. Those efforts at preparation did not pay off, and some Trump advisers were privately candid that his hectoring performance recalled how he handled briefings with reporters about the coronavirus last spring, to his political detriment.

With just over a month left in the campaign, Republicans feared Mr. Trump’s conduct would inevitably make the election a referendum on him and inflict carnage on other G.O.P. candidates with voting groups already deeply distrustful of the party: women, moderates, suburban voters and people of color.

Credit...Tom Brenner for The New York Times

With their Senate majority hanging in the balance, and House Republicans at risk of sinking deeper into the minority, party leaders urged Mr. Trump to do more in the next debates to trumpet their accomplishments on taxes, judges and foreign policy in a way that could make the party palatable for voters in the political center.

“If the ‘suburban housewife’ he keeps talking about really is the whole deal, it’s hard to think he didn’t go backwards with her,” said former Gov. Bill Haslam of Tennessee.

Republicans conceded that it would not be easy to rein in Mr. Trump, whose approach to politics is largely driven by his personal instincts and grievances — and a profound aversion to criticizing anyone whom he counts among his admirers, whether that is President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, the former Senate candidate Roy S. Moore of Alabama or followers of the online QAnon conspiracy theory.

Other Republicans were despairing not just for their party and its prospects in November but for the country after a debate that they felt represented a low point in American political history.

“I was embarrassed, that’s why I shut off,” said Marc Racicot, the former Montana governor and chairman of the Republican National Committee under former President George W. Bush. “I thought it was a degradation.”

Alluding to Mr. Trump’s remarks about the Proud Boys, Mr. Racicot said the president offered comfort to racists that betrayed the moral leadership responsibilities of his office.

He said he knew he could not support Mr. Trump but had recently decided to vote for Mr. Biden.

“It gnawed at my conscience,” Mr. Racicot said, adding of the president: “I’ve concluded that he’s dangerous to the existence of the republic as we know it.”

Michael D. Shear contributed reporting.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"to" - Google News
October 01, 2020 at 08:14AM
https://ift.tt/34atz9j

G.O.P. Alarmed by Trump’s Failure to Disavow the Proud Boys - The New York Times
"to" - Google News
https://ift.tt/368wPko
https://ift.tt/2YvVgrG

Executive Order on Addressing the Threat to the Domestic Supply Chain from Reliance on Critical Minerals from Foreign Adversaries - Whitehouse.gov

opinionfrom.blogspot.com

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that a strong America cannot be dependent on imports from foreign adversaries for the critical minerals that are increasingly necessary to maintain our economic and military strength in the 21st century. Because of the national importance of reliable access to critical minerals, I signed Executive Order 13817 of December 20, 2017 (A Federal Strategy To Ensure Secure and Reliable Supplies of Critical Minerals), which required the Secretary of the Interior to identify critical minerals and made it the policy of the Federal Government “to reduce the Nation’s vulnerability to disruptions in the supply of critical minerals.” Pursuant to my order, the Secretary of the Interior conducted a review with the assistance of other executive departments and agencies (agencies) that identified 35 minerals that (1) are “essential to the economic and national security of the United States,” (2) have supply chains that are “vulnerable to disruption,” and (3) serve “an essential function in the manufacturing of a product, the absence of which would have significant consequences for our economy or our national security.”

These critical minerals are necessary inputs for the products our military, national infrastructure, and economy depend on the most. Our country needs critical minerals to make airplanes, computers, cell phones, electricity generation and transmission systems, and advanced electronics. Though these minerals are indispensable to our country, we presently lack the capacity to produce them in processed form in the quantities we need. American producers depend on foreign countries to supply and process them. For 31 of the 35 critical minerals, the United States imports more than half of its annual consumption. The United States has no domestic production for 14 of the critical minerals and is completely dependent on imports to supply its demand. Whereas the United States recognizes the continued importance of cooperation on supply chain issues with international partners and allies, in many cases, the aggressive economic practices of certain non-market foreign producers of critical minerals have destroyed vital mining and manufacturing jobs in the United States.

Our dependence on one country, the People’s Republic of China (China), for multiple critical minerals is particularly concerning. The United States now imports 80 percent of its rare earth elements directly from China, with portions of the remainder indirectly sourced from China through other countries. In the 1980s, the United States produced more of these elements than any other country in the world, but China used aggressive economic practices to strategically flood the global market for rare earth elements and displace its competitors. Since gaining this advantage, China has exploited its position in the rare earth elements market by coercing industries that rely on these elements to locate their facilities, intellectual property, and technology in China. For instance, multiple companies were forced to add factory capacity in China after it suspended exports of processed rare earth elements to Japan in 2010, threatening that country’s industrial and defense sectors and disrupting rare earth elements prices worldwide.

The United States also disproportionately depends on foreign sources for barite. The United States imports over 75 percent of the barite it consumes, and over 50 percent of its barite imports come from China. Barite is of critical importance to the hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) industry, which is vital to the energy independence of the United States. The United States depends on foreign sources for 100 percent of its gallium, with China producing around 95 percent of the global supply. Gallium-based semiconductors are indispensable for cellphones, blue and violet light-emitting diodes (LEDs), diode lasers, and fifth-generation (5G) telecommunications. Like for gallium, the United States is 100 percent reliant on imports for graphite, which is used to make advanced batteries for cellphones, laptops, and hybrid and electric cars. China produces over 60 percent of the world’s graphite and almost all of the world’s production of high-purity graphite needed for rechargeable batteries.

For these and other critical minerals identified by the Secretary of the Interior, we must reduce our vulnerability to adverse foreign government action, natural disaster, or other supply disruptions. Our national security, foreign policy, and economy require a consistent supply of each of these minerals.

I therefore determine that our Nation’s undue reliance on critical minerals, in processed or unprocessed form, from foreign adversaries constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.

In addition, I find that the United States must broadly enhance its mining and processing capacity, including for minerals not identified as critical minerals and not included within the national emergency declared in this order. By expanding and strengthening domestic mining and processing capacity today, we guard against the possibility of supply chain disruptions and future attempts by our adversaries or strategic competitors to harm our economy and military readiness. Moreover, additional domestic capacity will reduce United States and global dependence on minerals produced in countries that do not endorse and pursue appropriate minerals supply chain standards, leading to human rights violations, forced and child labor, violent conflict, and health and environmental damage. Finally, a stronger domestic mining and processing industry fosters a healthier and faster-growing economy for the United States. Mining and mineral processing provide jobs to hundreds of thousands of Americans whose daily work allows our country and the world to “Buy American” for critical technology.

I hereby determine and order:

Section 1. (a) To address the national emergency declared by this order, and pursuant to subsection 203(a)(1)(B) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(a)(1)(B)), the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Commerce, and the heads of other agencies, as appropriate, shall investigate our Nation’s undue reliance on critical minerals, in processed or unprocessed form, from foreign adversaries. The Secretary of the Interior shall submit a report to the President, through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy, and the Assistant to the President for Trade and Manufacturing Policy, within 60 days of the date of this order. That report shall summarize any conclusions from this investigation and recommend executive action, which may include the imposition of tariffs or quotas, other import restrictions against China and other non-market foreign adversaries whose economic practices threaten to undermine the health, growth, and resiliency of the United States, or other appropriate action, consistent with applicable law.

(b) By January 1, 2021, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the heads of other agencies, as appropriate, shall inform the President of the state of the threat posed by our Nation’s reliance on critical minerals, in processed or unprocessed form, from foreign adversaries and recommend any additional actions necessary to address that threat.

(c) The Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the heads of other agencies, as appropriate, is hereby authorized to submit recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 2. (a) It is the policy of the United States that relevant agencies should, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, prioritize the expansion and protection of the domestic supply chain for minerals and the establishment of secure critical minerals supply chains, and should direct agency resources to this purpose, such that:

(i) the United States develops secure critical minerals supply chains that do not depend on resources or processing from foreign adversaries;

(ii) the United States establishes, expands, and strengthens commercially viable critical minerals mining and minerals processing capabilities; and

(iii) the United States develops globally competitive, substantial, and resilient domestic commercial supply chain capabilities for critical minerals mining and processing.

(b) Within 30 days of the date of this order, the heads of all relevant agencies shall each submit a report to the President, through the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, and the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy, that identifies all legal authorities and appropriations that the agency can use to meet the goals identified in subsection (a) of this section.

(c) Within 60 days of the date of this order, the heads of all relevant agencies shall each submit a report as provided in subsection (b) of this section that details the agency’s strategy for using the legal authorities and appropriations identified pursuant to that subsection to meet the goals identified in subsection (a) of this section. The report shall explain how the agency’s activities will be organized and how it proposes to coordinate relevant activities with other agencies.

(d) Within 60 days of the date of this order, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall submit a report to the President, through the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy, and the Assistant to the President for Trade and Manufacturing Policy, that describes the current state of research and development activities undertaken by the Federal Government that relate to the mapping, extraction, processing, and use of minerals and that identifies future research and development needs and funding opportunities to strengthen domestic supply chains for minerals.

(e) Within 45 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the United States Trade Representative, shall submit a report to the President, through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy, and the Assistant to the President for Trade and Manufacturing Policy, that details existing and planned efforts and policy options to:

(i) reduce the vulnerability of the United States to the disruption of critical mineral supply chains through cooperation and coordination with partners and allies, including the private sector;

(ii) build resilient critical mineral supply chains, including through initiatives to help allies build reliable critical mineral supply chains within their own territories;

(iii) promote responsible minerals sourcing, labor, and business practices; and

(iv) reduce the dependence of the United States on minerals produced using methods that do not adhere to responsible mining standards.

Sec. 3. The Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall consider whether the authority delegated at section 306 of Executive Order 13603 of March 16, 2012 (National Defense Resources Preparedness) can be used to establish a program to provide grants to procure or install production equipment for the production and processing of critical minerals in the United States.

Sec. 4. (a) Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Energy shall develop and publish guidance (and, as appropriate, shall revoke, revise, or replace prior guidance, including loan solicitations) clarifying the extent to which projects that support domestic supply chains for minerals are eligible for loan guarantees pursuant to Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, as amended (42 U.S.C. 16511 et seq.) (“Title XVII”), and for funding awards and loans pursuant to the Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing incentive program established by section 136 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, as amended (42 U.S.C. 17013) (“the ATVM statute”). In developing such guidance, the Secretary:

(i) shall consider whether the relevant provisions of Title XVII can be interpreted in a manner that better promotes the expansion and protection of the domestic supply chain for minerals (including the development of new supply chains and the processing, remediation, and reuse of materials already in interstate commerce or otherwise available domestically);

(ii) shall examine the meaning of the terms “avoid, reduce, or sequester” and other key terms in section 16513(a) of title 42, United States Code, which provides that the Secretary “may make guarantees under this section only for projects that — (1) avoid, reduce, or sequester air pollutants or anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases; and (2) employ new or significantly improved technologies as compared to commercial technologies in service in the United States at the time the guarantee is issued”;

(iii) shall consider whether relevant provisions of the ATVM statute may be interpreted in a manner that better promotes the expansion and protection of the domestic supply chain for minerals (including the development of new supply chains and the processing, remediation, and reuse of materials already in interstate commerce or otherwise available domestically), including in such consideration the application of these provisions to minerals determined to be components installed for the purpose of meeting the performance requirements of advanced technology vehicles; and

(iv) shall examine the meaning of the terms “qualifying components” and other key terms in subsection 17013(a) of title 42, United States Code.

(b) Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Energy shall review the Department of Energy’s regulations (including any preambles thereto) interpreting Title XVII and the ATVM statute, including the regulations published at 81 Fed. Reg. 90,699 (Dec. 15, 2016) and 73 Fed. Reg. 66,721 (Nov. 12, 2008), and shall identify all such regulations that may warrant revision or reconsideration in order to expand and protect the domestic supply chain for minerals (including the development of new supply chains and the processing, remediation, and reuse of materials already in interstate commerce or otherwise available domestically). Within 90 days of the date of this order, the Secretary shall propose for notice and comment a rule or rules to revise or reconsider any such regulations for this purpose, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law.

Sec. 5. The Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Commerce, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of the Army (acting through the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works), and the heads of all other relevant agencies shall, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, use all available authorities to accelerate the issuance of permits and the completion of projects in connection with expanding and protecting the domestic supply chain for minerals.

Sec. 6. The Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Energy, and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall examine all available authorities of their respective agencies and identify any such authorities that could be used to accelerate and encourage the development and reuse of historic coal waste areas, material on historic mining sites, and abandoned mining sites for the recovery of critical minerals.

Sec. 7. Amendment. Executive Order 13817 is hereby amended to add the following sentence to the end of section 2(b): “This list shall be updated periodically, following the same process, to reflect current data on supply, demand, and concentration of production, as well as current policy priorities.”

Sec. 8. Definitions. As used in this order:

(a) the term “critical minerals” means the minerals and materials identified by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to section 2(b) of Executive Order 13817, as amended by this order; and

(b) the term “supply chain,” when used with reference to minerals, includes the exploration, mining, concentration, separation, alloying, recycling, and reprocessing of minerals.

Sec. 9. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,
September 30, 2020.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"to" - Google News
October 01, 2020 at 07:32AM
https://ift.tt/2G6qXBr

Executive Order on Addressing the Threat to the Domestic Supply Chain from Reliance on Critical Minerals from Foreign Adversaries - Whitehouse.gov
"to" - Google News
https://ift.tt/368wPko
https://ift.tt/2YvVgrG

The Proud Boys, Who Trade in Political Violence, Get a Boost From Trump - The New York Times

When hundreds of supporters of President Trump gathered for a Labor Day rally in Oregon, a man in the signature black-and-gold shirt of the Proud Boys approached the crowd with a welcoming smile.

If the Republican activists ever needed security for an event, said the man, Flip Todd, the Proud Boys were available. They had sworn loyalty to the country and the president, he said. “We’ll continue to fight for you.”

It took only a few hours to demonstrate what that might entail. As some in the rally caravanned by car to Salem, the state capital, the Proud Boys joined a group of right-wing demonstrators who rushed across a street and began attacking people who had set up a leftist counterprotest. At one point, a large man in a bulletproof vest knocked a much smaller counterprotester to the ground, an event the Proud Boys celebrated later when they posted video of the attack. “Hulk smash!” it said.

The far-right band of brothers who have turned street thuggery into political theater had not quite become a household name before President Trump was asked about the Proud Boys during Tuesday night’s presidential debate, and whether he would condemn white supremacists: “Proud Boys,” he said, “stand back and stand by.”

Within minutes of hearing the president’s remark, Enrique Tarrio, the Proud Boys’ chairman, called down to the T-shirt business he owns in Miami with an order to get the presses rolling. “PROUD BOYS STANDING BY,” the new shirts said.

Credit...Diana Zeyneb Alhindawi for The New York Times

To Gavin McInnes, the founder and former chairman of the Proud Boys, the president’s request was a call to action against antifa, the loose collective of antifascist activists who have mounted raucous street demonstrations against police violence, corporate dominance and inequality in cities across America this summer.

“I think he was saying that if antifa starts burning down cities again, go in and fight them,” Mr. McInnes said. “I think he was saying I appreciate you and appreciate your support.”

The Proud Boys describe themselves as “western chauvinists” who “refuse to apologize for creating the modern world.” By reputation, the Proud Boys are a far-right group of brawlers where punches are part of membership initiation. Its participants have espoused misogynistic, Islamophobic, anti-Semitic and anti-immigrant views while making allies with white supremacists whom group leaders claim to disavow.

Over the past four years, the group has engaged in clashes in cities like Portland, Ore., and Berkeley, Calif., as well as at the notorious neo-Nazi march in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017 that was organized by a Proud Boys member.

Mr. Trump sought to quell a backlash from fellow Republicans over his remarks on Wednesday, denying any knowledge of the Proud Boys. And some in the Proud Boys sought to create distance as well. “I don’t see it, and the organization doesn’t see it, as a direct endorsement,” said Mr. Tarrio, the current chairman, contradicting his predecessor. Mr. Trump’s remarks about “standing by” were “a small slip,” he said, intended to suggest that the group should “stand by and let the cops do their job.”

But the president’s remark, which came after Joseph R. Biden Jr., the Democratic candidate, mentioned the group, also attracted attention and approval among avowed white supremacists. “I got shivers. I still have shivers,” wrote Andrew Anglin, the founder of the Daily Stormer, a neo-Nazi website. “He is telling the people to stand by. As in: get ready for war.”

While the Proud Boys claim to be anti-establishment, they also court members of the Republican elite and count Roger Stone, the conservative political consultant and ally of Mr. Trump, among their most high-profile supporters. Mr. Stone recorded a voice mail message for Mr. Tarrio, who dropped out of the Republican primary for a congressional seat in Florida this year after failing to attract much interest or financial support.

The Proud Boys have been able to make inroads with mainstream conservatives in part because its members wrap themselves in libertarian values, said Samantha Kutner of the Khalifa Ihler Institute, an academic collective that maps far-right groups globally. “It is hard for people to understand the kind of extremism that comes wrapped in the American flag,” she said.

Mr. McInnes, a co-founder of Vice, the provocative hipster magazine, established the Proud Boys in 2016 in New York.

Credit...Dave Sanders for The New York Times

He initially conceived of the group as a Knights of Columbus-like drinking club where men could come together in a kind of right-wing safe space. But after Mr. Trump took office, he and the group began to serve as bodyguards for ultraconservative speakers like Ann Coulter and Milo Yiannopoulos whose events were protested and occasionally shut down by left-wing antifa activists.

“I love being white and I think it’s something to be very proud of,” he told The New York Times in a 2003 interview. “I don’t want our culture diluted. We need to close the borders now and let everyone assimilate to a Western, white, English-speaking way of life.”

One of the group’s most notorious acts was a motorcade in 2017 through Islamberg, a hamlet in upstate New York, where a number of Muslim families had moved to escape racism and violence in New York City; the Proud Boys falsely accused the Muslims there of training Islamist extremists. On another occasion, the group crashed a fund-raising event for the victims of sexual violence at a bar in the Canadian city of Vancouver.

After Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, was arrested in August in the shooting deaths of two protesters in Kenosha, Wis., “Rittenhouse Did Nothing Wrong” was the kind of T-shirt that popped up at Proud Boy rallies.

Much of what the group does “is intended to provoke and trigger people, get them upset to the point that they want to engage in some kind of physical altercation,” Ms. Kutner said. Their tactics and ideology have led to accusations that they are the modern face of fascism.

Last year, in sentencing two Proud Boys members to lengthy jail sentences after a brawl with leftists in Manhattan, Justice Mark Dwyer of the New York State Supreme Court said such acts were particularly dangerous “at this time in the country when people are so divided.”

“I know enough about history to know what happened in Europe in the ’30s when political street brawls were allowed to go ahead,” he said.

Credit...Dave Sanders for The New York Times

Social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter have at times cracked down on the Proud Boys. Members have migrated to other organizing tools, such as their own website and the instant messaging platform Telegram.

Less than 24 hours after Mr. Trump made his comments, two of the largest Proud Boy groups on Telegram added hundreds of new members.

Mr. McInnes has claimed the Proud Boys have 5,000 members, with chapters in almost every state as well as about a half-dozen countries. Experts put the number much lower, at anywhere between 1,000 and 3,000.

Violence is built into the group’s very DNA. There are four levels of membership, starting with saying the pro-Western creed aloud, then moving higher to a Proud Boys tattoo. The highest level was once reserved for those who engage in violence on the group’s behalf.

The group’s flag, featuring a rooster weather vane pointing west, sports the words “The West is the Best,” and its annual convention, held recently in Las Vegas, is called WestFest. The group’s name was reportedly inspired by a song, “Proud of Your Boy,” written for the Disney film “Aladdin.”

Mr. McInnes insisted on Wednesday that there was not “some sort of secret standing army” of Proud Boys and militia men awaiting orders from the president to engage in street fighting. But if violent protests continue around the country, he said, “ordinary Americans are finally going to say, ‘We’re sick of you burning down our cities,’ and they’re going to start fighting back.”

The sources of the group’s funding remain murky. At one point, members seemed to be paying $20 a month in dues, said Megan Squire, a professor at Elon University in North Carolina who tracks extremist groups online. There is considerable overlap in their membership with neo-Nazi groups, she said.

The Proud Boys have long used Portland as a venue for clashing with local left-wing activists, and supporters of the group have been visible there throughout the summer, sometimes engaging in violent confrontations.

In mid-August, one participant in a right-wing demonstration fired two gunshots, authorities said. The following week, a Proud Boys supporter brandished a gun, pointing it at left-wing opponents. The next week, when a pro-Trump caravan motored into Portland, a supporter of the far-right group Patriot Prayer was fatally shot by an antifa activist — a killing that became a rallying cry for the Proud Boys.

Last weekend, the Proud Boys assembled in Portland, billing the gathering as an event to “end domestic terrorism.” They predicted that several thousand people would attend, from all over the country.

In the end, there were less than 1,000 — some of them members of other right-wing groups.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"from" - Google News
October 01, 2020 at 08:26AM
https://ift.tt/33jesec

The Proud Boys, Who Trade in Political Violence, Get a Boost From Trump - The New York Times
"from" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2SO3d93
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Man Charged With Attempting to Murder Two Los Angeles Sheriff’s Deputies - The New York Times

opinionfrom.blogspot.com

A man was charged on Wednesday with shooting two Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies who were sitting in their patrol car, an attack that was captured on video and that prompted widespread condemnation, including from both presidential candidates.

The man, Deonte Lee Murray, 36, of Compton, Calif., was charged with two counts of willful, deliberate and premeditated attempted murder of a peace officer and possession of a firearm by a felon, according to the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office.

Mr. Murray was arraigned on Wednesday in Los Angeles County Superior Court, where he pleaded not guilty and was ordered held with bail set at $6 million, according to his lawyer, Jack Keenan. If convicted, Mr. Murray could face life in prison.

Mr. Keenan said Mr. Murray was being harassed and threatened in jail by deputy sheriffs who were denying him food and waking him up at all hours. He said Mr. Murray was also being held in a unit for suicidal inmates and forced to wear a padded blanket known as a “suicide gown,” even though he is not suicidal.

Mr. Keenan said he had made a motion in court to have Mr. Murray relocated, but the motion was denied. “That’s my biggest concern with Mr. Murray,” he said, “his safety in jail.”

Mr. Keenan said he could not comment on the charges, because he had not seen the evidence against his client.

The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department said that independent health care professionals had evaluated Mr. Murray’s mental state. It said housing decisions based on those evaluations were “made at the recommendation of the medical staff, for the welfare of the inmate.”

“Deputies always treat everyone in our care and custody with the same professionalism, regardless of their charges,” the department said. “Sadly, Mr. Murray is not the only suspect in our custody at this time accused of assault on law enforcement. Mr. Murray has been in our custody for several weeks, but he was just identified as the suspect in the shooting this morning. Therefore it is odd these allegations of mistreatment only surfaced after that public identification.”

The authorities said that at about 7 p.m. on Sept. 12, Mr. Murray walked up to the deputies’ car outside the M.L.K. Transit Center, a metro station in Compton, and opened fire, striking the deputies multiple times. He then ran from the scene and drove off in a Mercedes that he had stolen in a carjacking on Sept. 1, the authorities said. Mr. Murray has also been charged in connection with that carjacking, the authorities said.

The deputies, a man, 24, and a woman, 31, who is the mother of a 6-year-old boy, were taken to a hospital in critical condition and underwent surgery, department officials said. The female deputy was able to call for help on a police radio despite having been shot, according to Alex Villanueva, the Los Angeles County sheriff.

Both deputies were recovering at home on Wednesday and face additional reconstructive surgeries, Sheriff Villanueva said.

The authorities said Mr. Murray appeared to have acted alone. Asked about a motive, Capt. Kent A. Wegener of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, said: “Other than the fact that he obviously hates policemen and wants them dead — not specifically.”

Jackie Lacey, the Los Angeles County district attorney, said the deputies “became victims of a violent crime for one reason: They were doing their job and they were wearing a badge.”

Sheriff Villanueva said that after the attack, bystanders were “celebrating and cheering” that the deputies had been shot.

“These acts, and then that day, I will not forget it,” Sheriff Villanueva said at a news conference on Wednesday. “It represents the worst of humanity and it shocked the whole nation.”

The day after the shooting, President Trump, who has campaigned on a call for “law and order” and who frequently depicts American cities as bastions of violence and hostility toward the police, responded on Twitter to a video of the shooting. “Animals that must be hit hard!” he wrote.

Mr. Trump, commenting on the deputies, also wrote: “If they die, fast trial death penalty for the killer. Only way to stop this!”

Former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., the Democratic presidential nominee, also denounced the shooting.

“Acts of lawlessness and violence directed against police officers are unacceptable, outrageous, and entirely counterproductive to the pursuit of greater peace and justice in America — as are the actions of those who cheer such attacks on,” he said in a statement on Sept. 13.

Video of the shooting showed a gunman approaching the passenger side of the car from behind, firing several rounds and then running away. Additional surveillance video showed one deputy exiting the passenger side of the patrol car, hand on head, according to The Los Angeles Times.

Deputy Juanita Navarro, a spokeswoman for the Sheriff’s Department, said the deputies had been shot multiple times in the upper torso, which she said could include the head and face. She declined to elaborate.

Mr. Murray was linked to the shooting of the deputies after he was connected to an unrelated carjacking on Sept. 1, when he shot a man in the leg and took his Mercedes in Compton, Captain Wegener said.

Witnesses and video in the area where the deputies were shot indicated that the Mercedes that the gunman drove that day was the same one that had been carjacked on Sept. 1, Captain Wegener said. The carjacking suspect’s photograph, when compared with video of the man who shot the deputies, further strengthened the case against Mr. Murray, he said.

On Sept. 15, the authorities tried to arrest Mr. Murray in connection with the carjacking, but he drove off in a Toyota, prompting a police chase, Captain Wegener said. During that chase, he added, Mr. Murray threw a pistol from the car, which was later recovered.

Ballistics testing showed the pistol was the same one used to shoot the deputies on Sept. 12, Captain Wegener said. Forensic evidence also linked the gun to Mr. Murray, he said.

Mr. Murray was eventually arrested after he abandoned the Toyota and tried to run from the police in Lynwood, Calif., Captain Wegener said. The authorities also recovered the stolen Mercedes, and have reviewed dozens of video clips that show Mr. Murray’s travels before, during and after the shooting on Sept. 12, he said.

As a felon and a registered drug offender, Mr. Murray was prohibited under the law from possessing a gun, Captain Wegener said. He said Mr. Murray’s record included previous convictions for the sale and possession of drugs, receiving stolen property, burglary and terrorist threats. He also said Mr. Murray was “associated with a couple of different gangs,” which he declined to name.

Larente Murray, Mr. Murray’s sister, said her brother had a rough upbringing, which she described as unstable and dysfunctional. She said he had “turned to the streets” and she had not spoken to him in three years.

“I want people to know that he’s human and, whether he did it or not, he needs to be treated fairly,” she said. “He needs a fair chance. And I’m concerned for his safety. I want justice for him and for him to know his family has his back.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"to" - Google News
October 01, 2020 at 05:24AM
https://ift.tt/3n3hco1

Man Charged With Attempting to Murder Two Los Angeles Sheriff’s Deputies - The New York Times
"to" - Google News
https://ift.tt/368wPko
https://ift.tt/2YvVgrG

Why it's impossible to believe Trump simply misspoke about the Proud Boys - CNN

opinionfrom.blogspot.com
His family (Donald Trump Jr.) and top campaign aides (Jason Miller) quickly moved to argue Trump had simply made a verbal error in not condemning the Proud Boys, who the Anti-Defamation League's CEO, Jonathan Greenblatt, told CNN on Wednesday "unequivocally are a hate group" -- and that his intent to condemn the group was clear.
"They style themselves as a quote pro-Western fraternity, but their rhetoric frequently invokes antisemitism, misogyny, xenophobia, particularly targeting immigrants, anti-Muslim bias and both homophobia and transphobia," Greenblatt added.
But this episode feels eerily similar to a number of moments as both a candidate and as President in which Trump seemed to condone (or, at the very least, failed to slap down) racists and hate groups who count themselves as his backers.
* In February 2016, CNN's Jake Tapper asked Trump, then a candidate for the Republican nomination, whether he would flatly reject the support of white supremacist groups and, in particular, former longtime KKK leader David Duke. "Just so you understand, I don't know anything about David Duke, OK?," Trump responded, adding: "I don't know anything about what you're even talking about with white supremacy or white supremacists. So I don't know. I don't know -- did he endorse me, or what's going on? Because I know nothing about David Duke; I know nothing about white supremacists." Trump's comment sparked a massive controversy; Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who was competing against Trump for the nomination at the time, said Trump's inability and unwillingness to distance himself from Duke made him unelectable. The following day, in an appearance on the "Today," show Trump blamed a "bad earpiece" for his answers (or lack thereof).
* In August 2017, in the wake of a white supremacist march in Charlottesville, Virginia, that left a counter-protester dead, Trump insisted that "many sides" were to blame for the violence. Days later, he doubled down on that sentiment, saying that "there is blame on both sides," and adding: "What about the 'alt-left' that came charging at, as you say, the 'alt-right,' do they have any semblance of guilt? What about the fact they came charging with clubs in hands, swinging clubs, do they have any problem? I think they do."
And then there are the literally dozens of times in which Trump has made either outright racist claims or sought to weaponize race for his own political benefit.
There was the time in 2019 when he tweeted that four congresswomen of color should "go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came." (Three members of "The Squad" were born in the United States; the fourth, Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar, is a naturalized American citizen.) Or the time he mocked the intelligence of LeBron James and CNN anchor Don Lemon. Or the time when questioned why the United States was accepting immigrants from "s---hole" countries in Africa. Or his pushing of a conspiracy theory that Barack Obama wasn't born in the United States despite ample evidence to the contrary. Or the lawsuit the federal government filed against him and his father in the 1970s for racial discrimination in housing rentals.
There's more. Much more. But the point here is clear: Donald Trump has a very long history of avoiding direct condemnation of white supremacist and other hate groups while simultaneously saying and doing things that any neutral observer would be forced to conclude are racist.
In short: Trump's baffling comment about the Proud Boys, which the group immediately embraced as a not-so-subtle call to action, don't land in a vacuum. If they did, maybe White House deputy press secretary Hogan Gidley could get away with saying -- credibly -- that what the President meant is that "he wants (Proud Boys) to get out of the way," as he did on CNN's "New Day" Wednesday morning.
The context -- the sheer reams of comments made by Trump about race and white supremacist groups -- is an avalanche, however. And it all points very clearly to this reality: Donald Trump has repeatedly not only refused to condemn hate groups but also, in the words he has chosen to describe them and their actions, provided cover and succor to them.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"to" - Google News
October 01, 2020 at 05:07AM
https://ift.tt/2GdqXzh

Why it's impossible to believe Trump simply misspoke about the Proud Boys - CNN
"to" - Google News
https://ift.tt/368wPko
https://ift.tt/2YvVgrG

Key fact checks from the first US presidential debate of 2020 - Al Jazeera English

The first presidential debate proved a chaotic affair that at times had more shouting and cross talk than policy.

However, claims made by President Donald Trump and Democratic challenger and former Vice President Joe Biden kept fact-checkers busy during the fiery 90-minute event in Cleveland, Ohio on Tuesday night.

Here are some key fact checks from the night on the coronavirus, racial justice protests, the economy, and voting.

Coronavirus

When it came to the coronavirus, one of the most pressing issues facing the country, Trump made the audacious claim that the death toll in the US, which is currently more than 200,000, would be 10 times higher if Biden had been president, while saying children are not vulnerable to the disease.

Those two claims were among many the president made that were false and misleading.

The accusation that there would be a higher death toll under Biden is predicated on the false assertion that Biden opposed Trump’s early February China travel restrictions. While Biden was slow in staking a position on the matter, when he finally did, he supported the restrictions.

The claim also echoed Trump’s repeated insistence that he banned travel from China. While the president restricted travel, he still allowed travel from the territories of Hong Kong and Macao.

The Associated Press news agency reported that more than 8,000 Chinese and foreign nationals based in the two locales entered the US in the first three months after the travel restrictions were imposed, while more than 27,000 Americans returned from mainland China in the first month after the restrictions took effect. US officials lost track of more than 1,600 of them who were supposed to be monitored for virus exposure.

People watch the first presidential debate between Trump and Biden [Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu Agency]
The president also asserted there have not been any outbreaks related to his campaign rallies, which have been widely criticised for not adhering to crowd limits, social distancing, and mask-wearing.

“So far we have had no problem whatsoever. It’s outside, that’s a big difference according to the experts. We have tremendous crowds,” Trump said.

That statement is false. Following Trump’s indoor rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma in late June, which drew thousands of participants, the Tulsa City-County Health Department director said the rally “likely contributed” to a dramatic surge in new coronavirus cases there.

While there has not been contact-tracing to determine the exact effect of the rally on the outbreak in the city, Trump does not have the information to assert there have been “no problems whatsoever”.

By the first week of July, Tulsa County was confirming more than 200 new daily cases, setting record highs. That is more than twice the number the week before the rally.

Meanwhile, Biden claimed Trump still has no plan to respond to the coronavirus. That is also false.

While the merits of the Trump administration plan can be debated, Trump in September laid out the most detailed plan to date on how it would distribute vaccines, while showing how the government would make the vaccine free of cost.

Biden also misleadingly said Trump would no longer provide masks for schools. According to factcheck.org, while one federal programme to pay for masks has ended, another is aiming to provide 125 million masks to schools.

Protests and crime

Both candidates made misleading or false statements in regard to continuing protests sparked following the police-involved death of George Floyd in Minnesota in May.

Trump has repeatedly seized on the at-times violent unrest, particularly in Portland, Oregon, to push a “law and order” message that says cities and suburbs are under threat from violent agitators.

On Tuesday, Trump said: “The (Portland, Oregon) sheriff just came out today and he said I support President Trump.”

That claim is false. The sheriff of Multnomah County, Oregon, which encompasses Portland, said he does not support Trump, tweeting: “As the Multnomah County Sheriff I have never supported Donald Trump and will never support him.”

Meanwhile, Biden, referencing a June 1 incident in Lafayette Square, in Washington, DC said: “There was a peaceful protest in front of the White House. What did [Trump] do? He came out of his bunker, had the military do tear gas.”

That statement includes false claims: It was law enforcement, not the military, that used chemical irritants to forcefully remove peaceful protesters from the square.

There is also no evidence Trump was inside a “bunker” in the White House as the clearing took place.

Trump and Biden made several misleading or false claims during the debate [File: Morry Gash/Reuters]
Secret Service agents had rushed Trump to a White House bunker days earlier as hundreds of protesters gathered outside the executive mansion, some of them throwing rocks and tugging at police barricades.

Crime

Meanwhile, when it comes to crime, both candidates also made misleading claims, with Biden overstating the drop in violent crime during his eight years in office as part of the administration of former President Barack Obama.

“The fact of the matter is violent crime went down 17 percent, 15 percent, in our administration,” Biden said.

Overall, the number of violent crimes fell roughly 10 percent from 2008, the year before Biden took office as vice president, to 2016, his last full year in the office, according to data from the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting programme.

However, the number of violent crimes was spiking again during Obama and Biden’s final two years in office, increasing by 8 percent from 2014 to 2016.

More people were murdered across the US in 2016, for example, than at any other point under the Obama administration.

Biden also said violent crime went up under Trump. That is false, according to Factcheck.org. The number of violent crimes (murder, rape, robbery and aggravated assault) actually went down 3.5 percent between 2016 and 2018, and dropped another 3.1 percent in the first six months of 2019.

Trump, for his part, claimed Biden had referred to Black citizens as “super-predators” in support of a controversial 1994 crime bill, which is largely credited with leading to mass incarceration in the country.

The phrase was actually used by Hillary Clinton in 1996 referring to “kids” in gangs. There is no evidence Biden used that phrase.

Economy and Trade

In terms of the economy, Biden claimed Trump will be the “first [president] in American history” to lose jobs during his presidency.

The AP news agency noted that claim is false. While Trump would be the first president to lose jobs since the government began recording official job numbers in 1939. Herbert Hoover lost jobs during his presidency amid the Great Depression, before being voted out of office in 1932.

Trump also made misleading claims about the country’s ability to bounce back from the pandemic recession, touting the record job increases in recent months.

While increases have set records following the worst job losses in March and April, according to Politifact, Trump neglected to give the wider context: That employment still remains down by about 11.5 million jobs from before the pandemic began.

Voting

During the debate, Trump also made several false statements about voting, continuing his unfounded claims that mail-in voting leads to high rates of fraud. Experts have said there is no evidence to support that claim. About half of US voters are expected to vote by mail in November.

Trump referenced an instance in West Virginia of “mailmen selling ballots”.

While a mail carrier in West Virginia pleaded guilty to attempting to commit election fraud, it was not related to selling ballots, according to Politifact, who could not find any evidence of mail deliverers selling ballots in the state.

Instead, the mail carrier in West Virginia, Thomas Cooper, admitted to altering some party ballot request forms during the primary, changing the registration from Democrat to Republican.

He later told authorities the action was a joke.

Trump also falsely claimed “poll watchers” were thrown out of a Philadelphia polling site on Tuesday.

He was apparently referring to an incident involving a new satellite office the city had opened for a new form of early voting. The office is not a polling place and no permits have been issued for poll watchers there, a city official told local media.

Nevertheless, a woman showed up at a satellite office on Tuesday and said she was there to monitor the election. She did not provide any proof she was a poll watcher and was turned away.

Nazdar Barzani contributed research.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"from" - Google News
October 01, 2020 at 03:56AM
https://ift.tt/2Sa3CRE

Key fact checks from the first US presidential debate of 2020 - Al Jazeera English
"from" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2SO3d93
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Search

Featured Post

5 key takeaways from Xi's trip to Saudi Arabia - CNN

Editor’s Note: A version of this story appears in CNN’s Meanwhile in today’s Middle East newsletter, a three-times-a-week look inside the r...

Postingan Populer